Game Preview

Debating First negative speaker

Sorry, you need Baamboozle+ to continue.
  •  English    20     Public
    Debating
  •   Study   Slideshow
  • 1. What is the primary role of the first negative speaker?
    Introduce their team's stance and arguments
    Rebut the affirmative team's arguments
    Summarize the debate so far.
  •  15
  • 2. What might a negative team argue if they believe the affirmative's problem is exaggerated?
    The problem is not as severe as stated
    The affirmative's solution is perfect.
    The problem is exactly as the affirmative team describes
  •  15
  • 3. How can the first negative speaker refute the affirmative team's solution effectively?
    By agreeing with the solution's effectiveness
    By suggesting an unrelated solution.
    By arguing the solution won't solve the problem
  •  15
  • 4. Which is a potential stance the negative team might take?
    The status quo is problematic and needs change.
    The affirmative team's plan is the only way forward
    The affirmative team's plan will make things worse
  •  15
  • 5. What is crucial for the first negative speaker to achieve in their speech?
    Clearly state their team's position and counter-arguments
    List all the speakers in order
    Thank the judges and audience for their attention.
  •  15
  • 6. If the negative team acknowledges a problem, what stance could they take?
    The affirmative's plan is too costly
    The problem should be ignored.
    The affirmative's plan is ineffective in addressing it
  •  15
  • 7. What strategy can the first negative speaker use to cover all bases?
    Repeating the affirmative's arguments for clarity
    Focusing solely on their team's strengths.
    Even if statements to address potential contradictions
  •  15
  • 8. How should the first negative speaker rebut the affirmative's points?
    By focusing on minor details irrelevant to the main argument.
    By providing logical counterarguments and evidence
    By restating the affirmative's points as their own
  •  15
  • 9. In what way might the negative team argue against the problem's existence?
    By showing it is exaggerated or unrealistic
    By suggesting the problem is beneficial.
    By admitting the problem is too big to solve
  •  15
  • 10. What is a key tactic for the first negative speaker when introducing their team's stance?
    Presenting a new topic not related to the debate.
    Outlining the negative team's primary arguments and position
    Reciting a poem to engage the audience
  •  15
  • 11. How can the negative team suggest improvements to the problem?
    By supporting the affirmative team's plan without changes.
    By proposing a counter-model that better addresses the issue
    By stating no improvements are necessary
  •  15
  • 12. What should the negative team do if they believe the affirmative's plan has negative outcomes?
    Argue the plan's potential harms outweigh its benefits
    Propose a vote to immediately implement the plan
    Suggest that any action is better than no action.
  •  15
  • 13. How can the negative team address the affirmative team's problem statement?
    By critically evaluating the validity and severity of the problem
    By agreeing with every point made by the affirmative team
    By changing the subject to avoid addressing the problem.
  •  15
  • 14. What is an effective conclusion strategy for the first negative speaker?
    Summarizing their rebuttals and reinforcing their team's stance
    Ending with a joke to lighten the mood.
    Introducing an entirely new argument in their conclusion
  •  15
  • 15. How might the negative team critique the affirmative's solution feasibility?
    By suggesting that all solutions are equally viable
    By questioning the practicality and effectiveness of the solution
    By endorsing the affirmative's solution as the best option.
  •  15
  • 16. How should contradictions in the negative team's arguments be handled?
    Using "even if" statements to provide a cohesive argument
    Ignoring any contradictions that arise
    Agreeing with the affirmative team to avoid conflict.
  •  15