Game Preview

Debating First negative speaker

Sorry, you need Baamboozle+ to continue.
  •  English    20     Public
    Debating
  •   Study   Slideshow
  • 1. What is the primary role of the first negative speaker?
    Summarize the debate so far.
    Introduce their team's stance and arguments
    Rebut the affirmative team's arguments
  •  15
  • 2. What might a negative team argue if they believe the affirmative's problem is exaggerated?
    The affirmative's solution is perfect.
    The problem is not as severe as stated
    The problem is exactly as the affirmative team describes
  •  15
  • 3. How can the first negative speaker refute the affirmative team's solution effectively?
    By suggesting an unrelated solution.
    By arguing the solution won't solve the problem
    By agreeing with the solution's effectiveness
  •  15
  • 4. Which is a potential stance the negative team might take?
    The affirmative team's plan is the only way forward
    The affirmative team's plan will make things worse
    The status quo is problematic and needs change.
  •  15
  • 5. What is crucial for the first negative speaker to achieve in their speech?
    List all the speakers in order
    Clearly state their team's position and counter-arguments
    Thank the judges and audience for their attention.
  •  15
  • 6. If the negative team acknowledges a problem, what stance could they take?
    The affirmative's plan is too costly
    The affirmative's plan is ineffective in addressing it
    The problem should be ignored.
  •  15
  • 7. What strategy can the first negative speaker use to cover all bases?
    Focusing solely on their team's strengths.
    Repeating the affirmative's arguments for clarity
    Even if statements to address potential contradictions
  •  15
  • 8. How should the first negative speaker rebut the affirmative's points?
    By restating the affirmative's points as their own
    By providing logical counterarguments and evidence
    By focusing on minor details irrelevant to the main argument.
  •  15
  • 9. In what way might the negative team argue against the problem's existence?
    By showing it is exaggerated or unrealistic
    By suggesting the problem is beneficial.
    By admitting the problem is too big to solve
  •  15
  • 10. What is a key tactic for the first negative speaker when introducing their team's stance?
    Outlining the negative team's primary arguments and position
    Reciting a poem to engage the audience
    Presenting a new topic not related to the debate.
  •  15
  • 11. How can the negative team suggest improvements to the problem?
    By proposing a counter-model that better addresses the issue
    By supporting the affirmative team's plan without changes.
    By stating no improvements are necessary
  •  15
  • 12. What should the negative team do if they believe the affirmative's plan has negative outcomes?
    Propose a vote to immediately implement the plan
    Argue the plan's potential harms outweigh its benefits
    Suggest that any action is better than no action.
  •  15
  • 13. How can the negative team address the affirmative team's problem statement?
    By critically evaluating the validity and severity of the problem
    By changing the subject to avoid addressing the problem.
    By agreeing with every point made by the affirmative team
  •  15
  • 14. What is an effective conclusion strategy for the first negative speaker?
    Introducing an entirely new argument in their conclusion
    Ending with a joke to lighten the mood.
    Summarizing their rebuttals and reinforcing their team's stance
  •  15
  • 15. How might the negative team critique the affirmative's solution feasibility?
    By endorsing the affirmative's solution as the best option.
    By questioning the practicality and effectiveness of the solution
    By suggesting that all solutions are equally viable
  •  15
  • 16. How should contradictions in the negative team's arguments be handled?
    Using "even if" statements to provide a cohesive argument
    Agreeing with the affirmative team to avoid conflict.
    Ignoring any contradictions that arise
  •  15