an in case-clause gives a reason. We can use should after in case.
When
it can replace if in zero conditionals; in the other types of conditionals, we cannot use when instead of if.
Provided that / Providing that
It can interchangeably be used to mean "if - on condition that"
Only If
it makes the condition more restrictive
If + were to
In formal situations, we can use if + were to when we talk about things that might happen but which we think are unlikely (imagiinary)
Suppose/supposing, What if
they can replace if, mainly in everyday conversation, and are often used without a main clause.
if in doubt, if possible, if necessary…
we can make the if-clause shorter, by omitting the subject and the verb be; in certain idiomatic expressions, the subject and be are normally omitted.
even if
it emphasises that something will (or will not) happen, would (or would not) happen or would (or would not) have happened whatever the condition is/were.
if it weren’t for/if it hadn’t been for, but for
these expressions mean without; they are used in second and third conditionals and are usually followed by usually precede a noun phrase.
So/as long as, providing/provided (that
we can use them instead of if to express a condition; note that providing/provided (that) is a bit formal.
Unless
it appears before an affirmative verb to express if … not.
Or / otherwise
Otherwise is used as a linking adverb and has the meaning of apart from this or if we disregard this:
Your experience on this site will be improved by allowing cookies.