SAT Vocab 16.2 Mar 26

The student delayed starting the assignment until the last possible moment. As a result, the work was rushed and incomplete. He chose to ______.

The argument combined two separate ideas into one incorrect conclusion. This mistake weakened the overall reasoning. It involved a ______.

Researchers predicted the outcome based on previous experiments and available data. The results did not come as a surprise. They had already ______ the findings.

The explanation was extremely detailed and carefully broken down step by step. It helped clarify a difficult concept. It was an ______.

The explorer eagerly entered dangerous territory without hesitation. His willingness to take risks defined his character. He was ______.

The speech was so convincing that the audience fully accepted the argument. It captured attention and persuaded listeners. It was highly ______.

The speaker referred to the proposal in a way that suggested it was unimportant or flawed. His tone showed clear disapproval. He spoke ______ about the idea.

During the debate, he responded to every point with disagreement and confrontation. His tone escalated the discussion rather than calming it. He spoke ______.

The author submitted her original written work to a publisher for review. The document had not yet been edited or printed. It was a ______.

The author used humor and irony to criticize social behavior. The message was delivered indirectly but effectively. The work was an example of ______.

The region governed itself without interference from a central authority. Leaders made independent decisions based on local needs. It functioned as an ______ territory.

The technology demonstrated a high level of complexity and refinement. Its design reflected advanced development. It showed remarkable ______.

The report was examined carefully by multiple experts before publication. Every detail was reviewed closely. It was subjected to intense ______.

Instead of focusing on theory, she chose a practical approach to solving the issue. Her decisions were based on real-world results. She was highly ______.

The employee followed instructions without question and showed little independence. She accepted every decision without resistance. She acted ______.

The building included decorative features that served no practical purpose. These details were added purely for visual appeal. The design included ______ elements.

The manager criticized the employee in a harsh and direct manner. His comments were intended to highlight serious flaws. His feedback was ______.

Despite facing multiple setbacks, the team continued working toward their goal. They recovered quickly from difficulties. They remained ______.

The politician spoke harshly and criticized his opponent without restraint. His tone was aggressive and severe. His remarks were ______.

During the meeting, she expressed her opinions confidently and clearly. She did not hesitate to speak her mind. She was very ______.

The teenager refused to follow the rules and openly challenged authority. His behavior showed resistance rather than compliance. He acted ______.

After days without sleep, he became confused and unable to think clearly. His condition worsened due to exhaustion. He appeared ______.

The explanation was logical and easy to follow, with all ideas clearly connected. There were no contradictions. The argument was ______.

The theory seemed reasonable and likely to be true based on the available evidence. It was not proven, but it made sense logically. It was ______.

The new system improved efficiency in a significant and measurable way. Results showed a clear increase in productivity. Performance improved ______.

After a long discussion, both sides reached an agreement without hostility. The conflict ended peacefully. They resolved the issue ______.

After implementing new policies, the company saw clear improvements in employee satisfaction. Working conditions became noticeably better over time. The changes ______ the overall workplace environment.

The scientist based her conclusions strictly on observation and experimentation. No assumptions were made without evidence. Her method was ______.

The writer used overly complex language that made the argument difficult to follow. Readers struggled to understand the main point. The explanation was ______.

The researcher carefully recorded every detail to avoid errors. Nothing was overlooked in the process. Her work was extremely ______.