not be able to AFFORD college
have enough money to pay for
free college education would REQUIRE a significant investment
need for a specific purpose
have the opportunity to PURSUE higher education
follow or chase
such as INCREASING access
become greater
a topic of HEATED debate
emotional
with PROPONENTS arguing that
supporters
free college education would require a significant INVESTMENT
the giving of time, effort, energy, and/or money expecting a good result
universities would have less FUNDING to provide the necessary resources and services
money given for a specific purpose
which could be better spent on other areas such as healthcare, INFRASTRUCTURE, or social programs
basic (physical) systems of business and regions
without the BURDEN of crushing debt
a heavy load
which could be better spent on other areas such as HEALTHCARE, infrastructure, or social programs
health services by trained professionals
make higher education more ACCESSIBLE
able to be reached
it would have NUMEROUS benefits
many
OPPONENTS argue that
ones who compete against
it would help LEVEL THE PLAYING FIELD
make things fair
without the burden of CRUSHING debt
overwhelming
on the other hand
in contrast
REDUCING student debt
become less
free college education would reduce the QUALITY of education
level of excellence
students from LOW-INCOME families
related to earning little money
free college education would require a SIGNIFICANT investment
great, important
it would have numerous BENEFITS
advantages or gains
families who might OTHERWISE not be able to
in a different situation
reducing student DEBT
money owed