Toggle Navigation
Games
Blog
Class PIN
Join for Free
Sign in
Toggle Navigation
Games
PIN
Join for Free
Blog
Pricing
Contact us
Help center
Sign in
Game Preview
Research Methods Article
Game Code: 3746491
English
16
Public
Article
Play
Study
Slideshow
Share
Kaliq
2
Share Research Methods Article
Class PIN
Use Class PIN to share Baamboozle+ games with your students.
Upgrade
Google Classroom
Facebook
Twitter
Save to Folder
What was the primary aim of the study?
To test whether ABBI produces greater 24 month percent weight loss than SBT
5
What was the research design for this study?
randomized controlled trial, longitudinal repeated measures
10
Over the 12 months treatment period, how many treatment sessions did participants attend?
32 sessions
15
After the 12 month treatment period, how much contact did the participants have with researchers through month 24?
There was no contact between month 12 and the final assessment at month 24
20
What was the main inclusion criteria for participants in this study?
Overweight or obese, and high internal disinhibition
5
What primary measures did the researchers use to measure eating behaviors and internal disinhibition?
Eating Inventory
10
What was the primary outcome measure that was collected at follow-up assessments (baseline, 6, 12, 18, 24 months)?
Percent weight change
15
To ensure accuracy of the treatment delivery, sessions were rated for treatment fidelity. What was the intraclass correlation coefficient?
.92
20
True or False: ABBI showed statistically significant superiority over SBT on the primary 24 month percent weight-change assessment?
False
5
When did the researchers observe the greatest impact of ABBI?
Post intervention, between 18-24 months
10
True or False: The ABBI group regained a significant amount of weight during the post-treatment phase?
True
15
Which treatment (ABBI and SBT) had a significant effect on internal disinhibition? Were there differences between the two treatments?
Both treatments led to significant reductions in internal disinhibition, no significant differences between the two
20
Name one strength of the study.
:)
5
Name one weakness of the study.
:(
10
Was this study generalizable? Why or why not?
Limited generalizability - 85% female, 88% Caucasian, primarily from one region
15
The authors imply that there is a mechanism measurement gap related to ABBI (ACT) in their study. What does this mean?
when a phenomenon is not fully understood because the mechanisms cannot be adequately observed or measured
20
Play for Free
Baamboozle+
Baamboozle+
Baamboozle+
Baamboozle+
Baamboozle+
Baamboozle+
Baamboozle+
Baamboozle+
Baamboozle+
Baamboozle+
Baamboozle+
Baamboozle+
Baamboozle+
Baamboozle+
Baamboozle+
Baamboozle+
Baamboozle+
More
How to Play
Make some teams
Take turns choosing questions
Say the answer then hit the
Check
button
Click
Okay
if the team is correct or
Oops
if not
Teams
Sign in to choose
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Grid Size
Sign in to choose
8
16
Quiz
Sign in to choose
Classic
Questions and Power-Ups
Classic Jr
Sign in to choose
×
Sign up for a trial to unlock features.
Get Started
Your experience on this site will be improved by allowing cookies.
Allow cookies