What does “agentic AI” mean to you — do you view AI as just a tool, or potentially as an autonomous “agent”?

Could the widespread use of powerful, poorly supervised AI undermine human jobs — or will it create more opportunities?

In the article, many raters discourage others from using AI for sensitive tasks (like medical advice). Should regulations cap certain uses of AI (e.g. health, legal)? What might those caps look like?

If you were in charge of regulation, would you scale down the pace of AI deployment — or encourage rapid growth?

Could “giving AI the benefit of the doubt” be dangerous? Or is it sometimes necessary to push innovation forward — what’s your take?

If tomorrow you had to choose — only human-made content or AI-generated content for everything you read — which would you pick and why?

Do you think people should consult AI for creative or emotional tasks (therapy, companionship, decision-making)? Why or why not?

Do you think society might write off generative AI as a useful tool because of scandals — or will companies find a way to regain trust?

Have you ever had a hunch that a technological tool (not just AI) wasn’t as safe or reliable as advertised? What happened?

Do you think there’s a moral or social obligation for users (and companies) to be transparent about the inner human labour behind AI, or is that unnecessary risk for competitiveness?

If an AI system makes a mistake that harms someone (e.g. misinformation, bias), should the company be responsible — or also the users who trusted it?

If AI becomes truly autonomous and decision-making, should we consider giving such AI some form of “rights” or “welfare,” as some recent research suggests?

Can you size up — in broad strokes — the pros and cons of deploying “agentic AI” (AI systems capable of autonomous decisions) in business? What are the red flags?