If an AI system makes a mistake that harms someone (e.g. misinformation, bias), should the company be responsible — or also the users who trusted it?

How should companies offset the risks of AI (ethical, social, environmental)? What strategies or policies would you propose if you were leading a business that uses AI?

Do you think there’s a moral or social obligation for users (and companies) to be transparent about the inner human labour behind AI, or is that unnecessary risk for competitiveness?

If you were in charge of regulation, would you scale down the pace of AI deployment — or encourage rapid growth?

What does “agentic AI” mean to you — do you view AI as just a tool, or potentially as an autonomous “agent”?

Imagine a future where “agentic AIs” are coworkers. Would you prefer working alongside a human or an AI? What qualities would you expect from the AI coworker (skills? ethics? transparency?)

Could the widespread use of powerful, poorly supervised AI undermine human jobs — or will it create more opportunities?

Do you think people should consult AI for creative or emotional tasks (therapy, companionship, decision-making)? Why or why not?

Could “giving AI the benefit of the doubt” be dangerous? Or is it sometimes necessary to push innovation forward — what’s your take?

Can you size up — in broad strokes — the pros and cons of deploying “agentic AI” (AI systems capable of autonomous decisions) in business? What are the red flags?

If you were a CEO of a tech startup, would you resort to using partially trained AI models to rack up quick profits — or wait until they meet high ethical standards? Explain your reasoning.

Do you think society might write off generative AI as a useful tool because of scandals — or will companies find a way to regain trust?