Have you ever had a hunch that a technological tool (not just AI) wasn’t as safe or reliable as advertised? What happened?

Do you think there’s a moral or social obligation for users (and companies) to be transparent about the inner human labour behind AI, or is that unnecessary risk for competitiveness?

Do you think companies should hold off on releasing new AI tools until they are more thoroughly tested? Why or why not?

In the article, many raters discourage others from using AI for sensitive tasks (like medical advice). Should regulations cap certain uses of AI (e.g. health, legal)? What might those caps look like?

If an AI system makes a mistake that harms someone (e.g. misinformation, bias), should the company be responsible — or also the users who trusted it?

How should companies offset the risks of AI (ethical, social, environmental)? What strategies or policies would you propose if you were leading a business that uses AI?

If tomorrow you had to choose — only human-made content or AI-generated content for everything you read — which would you pick and why?

Could the widespread use of powerful, poorly supervised AI undermine human jobs — or will it create more opportunities?

Do you think society might write off generative AI as a useful tool because of scandals — or will companies find a way to regain trust?

If AI becomes truly autonomous and decision-making, should we consider giving such AI some form of “rights” or “welfare,” as some recent research suggests?

Could “giving AI the benefit of the doubt” be dangerous? Or is it sometimes necessary to push innovation forward — what’s your take?

Suppose you have to pitch (create a pitch-deck) for an AI-based startup that claims “ethical AI.” What arguments would you include to convince investors?

What does “agentic AI” mean to you — do you view AI as just a tool, or potentially as an autonomous “agent”?