The main criticism of Esperanto is that, despite its LOFTY ideals, the language never really caught on.
'LOFTY' must mean something like 'HIGH' , as the context makes it clear that it is some kind of positive adjective reinforcing the concept of ideals.
Oops!
Check
Okay!
Check
15
What Esperanto LACKS in culture it MAKES UP for in efficiency.
What Esperanto DOES NOT HAVE in culture it COMPENSATES FOR in efficiency.
Oops!
Check
Okay!
Check
15
It is CLAIMED to be EASY to MASTER.
It is said to be SIMPLE to LEARN.
Oops!
Check
Okay!
Check
15
What is INTERESTING is that, OVER A HUNDRED YEARS ago, a Dr Ludwig Zamenhof published a book about a new language that he had DEVELOPED.
What is FASCINATING is that, MORE THAN A CENTURY ago, a Dr Ludwig Zamenhof published a book about a new language that he had CREATED/DESIGNED.
Oops!
Check
Okay!
Check
15
The global uptake of Esperanto may not eventually TOPPLE English FROM ITS PERCH, consigning it to a status similar to that of modern-day Latin.
TOPPLE .. . FROM ITS PERCH' must mean 'REMOVE FROM ITS POSITIONâ, as that is what has happened to Latin, once also an international language.
Oops!
Check
Okay!
Check
thief
Give points!
5
10
15
20
25
fairy
Take points!
5
10
15
20
25
shark
Other team loses 5 points!
Okay!
lifesaver
Give 10 points!
Oops!
banana
Go to last place!
Oops!
magnet
Take 20 points!
Okay!
gift
Win 10 points!
Okay!
lifesaver
Give 20 points!
Oops!
15
Esperanto may well be the answer that second-Ianguage learners have been SEEKING.
'SEEKING' must mean something like âLOOKING FOR' or 'HOPING TO FIND', as that makes sense with the idea of second-language learners
Oops!
Check
Okay!
Check
15
However, advocates of Esperanto would COUNTER this criticism by maintaining that all languages can be considered as artificial.
'COUNTER' must mean 'ARGUE AGAINST' , as the context makes it clear that supporters of Esperanto would react negatively to criticisms made against it
Oops!
Check
Okay!
Check
seesaw
Swap points!
Oops!
gift
Win 25 points!
Okay!
rocket
Go to first place!
Okay!
baam
Lose 25 points!
Oops!
15
PROPONENTS of the language assert that it has succeeded in areas where English might have failed.
'PROPONENTS' must mean'SUPPORTERSâ or 'PEOPLE WHO ARE IN FAVOUR OF ', as the context makes it clear that proponents view Esperanto in a favourable light.
Oops!
Check
Okay!
Check
15
It may even be considered as maintaining a primarily Western point of view, something the creator of Esperanto initially set out to MITIGATE
'MITIGATE' must mean 'REDUCE' or 'MINIMISE', as the context suggests that the creator wouldn't have wished his new language present an exclusively Westem point
Oops!
Check
Okay!
Check
15
The language never really CAUGHT ON among THE GLOBAL POPULATION in the way its creator INTENDED.
The language never really SUCCEEDED among PEOPLE WORLDWIDE in the way its creator HOPED.
Oops!
Check
Okay!
Check
15
It is appreciated as being DEVOID OF the ideological or political CONNOTATIONS that accompany languages of FORMER colonial powers.
It is appreciated as being WITHOUT ANY of the ideological or political ASSOCIATIONS that accompany languages of ERSTWHILE/PREVIOUS colonial powers.
Oops!
Check
Okay!
Check
boom
Lose 50 points!
Oops!
gift
Win 15 points!
Okay!
rocket
Go to first place!
Okay!
baam
Lose 25 points!
Oops!
15
As an artificial language, it is appreciated as being DEVOID OF ideological or political connotations.
'Devoid of ' must mean 'WITHOUT' or 'LACKING', as clearly a language is more likely to be appreciated if it does not have any ideological or political associati
